Log on/register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch

Metformin treatment in diabetes and heart failure: when academic equipoise meets clinical reality

Dean T Eurich1 email, Ross T Tsuyuki2 email, Sumit R Majumdar1,2 email, Finlay A McAlister1,2 email, Richard Lewanczuk2 email, Marcelo C Shibata2 email and Jeffrey A Johnson1 email

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3, Canada

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C7, Canada

author email corresponding author email

Trials 2009, 10:12doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-12

Published: 9 February 2009

Abstract

Objective

Metformin has had a 'black box' contraindication in diabetic patients with heart failure (HF), but many believe it to be the treatment of choice in this setting. Therefore, we attempted to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a large randomized controlled trial with clinical endpoints.

Study Design

The pilot study was a randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial. Patients with HF and type 2 diabetes were screened in hospitals and HF clinics in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (population ~1 million). Major exclusion criteria included the current use of insulin or high dose metformin, decreased renal function, or a glycosylated hemoglobin <7%. Patients were to be randomized to 1500 mg of metformin daily or matching placebo and followed for 6 months for a variety of functional outcomes, as well as clinical events.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were screened over a six month period and all were excluded. Because of futility with respect to enrollment, the pilot study was abandoned. The mean age of screened patients was 77 (SD 9) years and 57% were male. The main reasons for exclusion were: use of insulin therapy (n = 23; 40%), glycosylated hemoglobin <7% (n = 17; 29%) and current use of high dose metformin (n = 12; 21%). Overall, contraindicated metformin therapy was the most commonly prescribed oral antihyperglycemic agent (n = 27; 51%). On average, patients were receiving 1,706 mg (SD 488 mg) of metformin daily and 12 (44%) used only metformin.

Conclusion

Despite uncertainty in the scientific literature, there does not appear to be clinical uncertainty with regards to the safety or effectiveness of metformin in HF making a definitive randomized trial virtually impossible.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00325910


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.