Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessMethodology

Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial

Matthew R Sydes1 email, Mahesh KB Parmar1 email, Nicholas D James2 email, Noel W Clarke3 email, David P Dearnaley4 email, Malcolm D Mason5 email, Rachel C Morgan1 email, Karen Sanders1 email and Patrick Royston1 email

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK

Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, UK

Christie and Salford Royal Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK

Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospitals, Sutton, UK

Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK

author email corresponding author email

Trials 2009, 10:39doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-39

Published: 11 June 2009

Abstract

Background

The multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) trial is a new paradigm for conducting randomised controlled trials that allows the simultaneous assessment of a number of research treatments against a single control arm. MAMS trials provide earlier answers and are potentially more cost-effective than a series of traditionally designed trials. Prostate cancer is the most common tumour in men and there is a need to improve outcomes for men with hormone-sensitive, advanced disease as quickly as possible. The MAMS design will potentially facilitate evaluation and testing of new therapies in this and other diseases.

Methods

STAMPEDE is an open-label, 5-stage, 6-arm randomised controlled trial using MAMS methodology for men with prostate cancer. It is the first trial of this design to use multiple arms and stages synchronously.

Results

The practical and statistical issues faced by STAMPEDE in implementing MAMS methodology are discussed and contrasted with those for traditional trials. These issues include the choice of intermediate and final outcome measures, sample size calculations and the impact of varying the assumptions, the process for moving between trial stages, stopping accrual to each trial arm and overall, and issues around perceived trial complexity.

Conclusion

It is possible to use the MAMS design to initiate and undertake large scale cancer trials. The results from STAMPEDE will not be known for some years but the lessons learned from running a MAMS trial are shared in the hope that other researchers will use this exciting and efficient method to perform further randomised controlled trials.

Trial registration

ISRCTN78818544, NCT00268476


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.