Peer Review reports
From: Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen |
| 17 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Nahin |
| 23 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Pogue |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 23 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Pogue |
| 1 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Taixiang Wu |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 4 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Taixiang Wu |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 4 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 5 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Taixiang Wu |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 5 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-10-46 |
You can find further information about peer review here.