Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Needleman |
13 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - He Jia |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen |
25 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Needleman |
24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - He Jia |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - He Jia |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
28 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - He Jia |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - He Jia |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
13 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-122 |
You can find further information about peer review here.