Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicola Jayne Robertson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alistair Gunn |
21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Wheatley |
20 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicola Jayne Robertson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alistair Gunn |
25 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Wheatley |
9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicola Jayne Robertson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicola Jayne Robertson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
2 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicola Jayne Robertson |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
2 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
4 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-138 |
You can find further information about peer review here.