Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Brady |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Dennis |
17 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Needleman |
16 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allan Donner |
25 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Gallo |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
17 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Brady |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Dennis |
23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Gallo |
24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Needleman |
31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allan Donner |
13 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Sandercock |
17 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Brady |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
30 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Brady |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
30 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
5 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-168 |
You can find further information about peer review here.