Peer Review reports
From: Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Friedman |
| 27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andy Vail |
| 22 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Martin Bland |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Martin Bland |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-264 |
You can find further information about peer review here.