Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
23 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
22 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Vas |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-59 |
You can find further information about peer review here.