Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Parsons |
22 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Stephen Coad |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Parsons |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Stephen Coad |
7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
18 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-81 |
You can find further information about peer review here.