Open Access Research

Improved clinical outcome after invasive management of patients with recent myocardial infarction and proven myocardial viability: primary results of a randomized controlled trial (VIAMI-trial)

Ramon B van Loon1*, Gerrit Veen1, Leo HB Baur2, Otto Kamp1, Jean GF Bronzwaer1, Jos WR Twisk3, Freek WA Verheugt4 and Albert C van Rossum1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2 Department of Cardiology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen and Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University Maastricht, The Netherlands

3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4 Heartcenter, University Medical Center, St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

Trials 2012, 13:1  doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-1

Published: 3 January 2012

Abstract

Background

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) not treated with primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk for recurrent ischemia, especially when viability in the infarct-area is present. Therefore, an invasive strategy with PCI of the infarct-related coronary artery in patients with viability would reduce the occurrence of a composite end point of death, reinfarction, or unstable angina (UA).

Methods

Patients admitted with an (sub)acute myocardial infarction, who were not treated by primary or rescue PCI, and who were stable during the first 48 hours after the acute event, were screened for the study. Eventually, we randomly assigned 216 patients with viability (demonstrated with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) to an invasive or a conservative strategy. In the invasive strategy stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery was intended with abciximab as adjunct treatment. Seventy-five (75) patients without viability served as registry group. The primary endpoint was the composite of death from any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina at one year. As secondary endpoint the need for (repeat) revascularization procedures and anginal status were recorded.

Results

The primary combined endpoint of death, recurrent MI and unstable angina was 7.5% (8/106) in the invasive group and 17.3% (19/110) in the conservative group (Hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.96; p = 0.032). During follow up revascularization-procedures were performed in 6.6% (7/106) in the invasive group and 31.8% (35/110) in the conservative group (Hazard ratio 0.18; 95% CI 0.13-0.43; p < 0.0001). A low rate of recurrent ischemia was found in the non-viable group (5.4%) in comparison to the viable-conservative group (14.5%). (Hazard-ratio 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-1.00; p = 0.051).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that after acute MI (treated with thrombolysis or without reperfusion therapy) patients with viability in the infarct-area benefit from a strategy of early in-hospital stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery. This treatment results in a long-term uneventful clinical course. The study confirmed the low risk of recurrent ischemia in patients without viability.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00149591.