Open Access Study protocol

The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) trial comparing transcatheter versus surgical valve implantation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Hans Gustav Thyregod1*, Lars Søndergaard2, Nikolaj Ihlemann2, Olaf Franzen2, Lars Willy Andersen3, Peter Bo Hansen3, Peter Skov Olsen1, Henrik Nissen4, Per Winkel5, Christian Gluud5 and Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

2 Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

3 Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

4 Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK 5000, Odense, Denmark

5 Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Tagensvej 22, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

For all author emails, please log on.

Trials 2013, 14:11 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-11

Published: 9 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Degenerative aortic valve (AV) stenosis is the most prevalent heart valve disease in the western world. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has until recently been the standard of treatment for patients with severe AV stenosis. Whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be offered with improved safety and similar effectiveness in a population including low-risk patients has yet to be examined in a randomised setting.

Methods/Design

This randomised clinical trial will evaluate the benefits and risks of TAVI using the transarterial CoreValve System (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (intervention group) compared with SAVR (control group) in patients with severe degenerative AV stenosis. Randomisation ratio is 1:1, enrolling a total of 280 patients aged 70 years or older without significant coronary artery disease and with a low, moderate, or high surgical risk profile. Trial outcomes include a primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality within the first year after intervention (expected rates 5% for TAVI, 15% for SAVR). Exploratory safety outcomes include procedure complications, valve re-intervention, and cardiovascular death, as well as cardiac, cerebral, pulmonary, renal, and vascular complications. Exploratory efficacy outcomes include New York Heart Association functional status, quality of life, and valve prosthesis and cardiac performance. Enrolment began in December 2009, and 269 patients have been enrolled up to December 2012.

Discussion

The trial is designed to evaluate the performance of TAVI in comparison with SAVR. The trial results may influence the choice of treatment modality for patients with severe degenerative AV stenosis.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01057173

Keywords:
Aortic valve stenosis; Aortic valve prosthesis; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Surgical aortic valve replacement; Randomised clinical trial design