Open Access Study protocol

Optimal schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for stage III colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Kenichi Yoshimura1*, Keisuke Uehara2*, Yuichiro Tojima3, Satoru Kawai4, Yasuji Mokuno5, Atsuyuki Maeda6, Takanori Kyokane7, Satoshi Kobayashi8, Yuichiro Yoshioka2 and Masato Nagino2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Clinical Trial Design & Management, Translational Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

2 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Syowa, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan

3 Department of Surgery, Chukyo Hospital, 1-1-10 Sanjo, Minami, Nagoya, Aichi, 457-8510, Japan

4 Department of Surgery, Tsushima City Hospital, 3-73 Tachibana, Tsushima, Aichi, 496-8537, Japan

5 Department of Surgery, Tokai Municipal Hospital, 1 Marune, Arao, Tokai, Aichi, 476-0003, Japan

6 Department of Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan

7 Department of Surgery, Fukuroi Municipal Hospital, 2515-1 Kuno, Fukuroi, Shizuoka, 437-0061, Japan

8 Department of Surgery, Toyota Kosei Hospital, 500-1 Ibohara, Jousui, Toyota, Aichi, 470-0343, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Trials 2013, 14:17  doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-17

Published: 15 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Although, in Western countries, oxaliplatin-based regimens have been established as a gold standard treatment for patients with stage III or high risk stage II colon cancer after curative resection, in Japan fluorouracil-based regimens have been widely accepted and recommended in the guidelines for adjuvant settings in patients with stage III colon cancer. S-1, an oral preparation evolved from uracil and tegafur, has equivalent efficacy to uracil and tegafur/leucovorin for treating patients with advanced colorectal cancer and might be a suitable regimen in an adjuvant setting. However, the completion rate of the standard six-week cycle of the S-1 regimen is poor and the establishment of an optimal treatment schedule is critical. Therefore, we will conduct a multicenter randomized phase II trial to compare six-week and three-week cycles to establish the optimal schedule of S-1 adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer after curative resection.

Methods/Design

The study is an open-label, multicenter randomized phase II trial. The primary endpoint of this study is three-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints are the completion rate of the treatment, relative dose intensity, overall survival, disease-free survival, and incidence of adverse events. The sample size was 200, determined with a significance level of 0.20, power of 0.80, and non-inferiority margin of a 10% absolute difference in the primary endpoint.

Discussion

Although S-1 has not been approved yet as a standard treatment of colon cancer in an adjuvant setting, it is a promising option. Moreover, in Japan S-1 is a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer after curative resection and a promising option for patients with colorectal liver metastases in an adjuvant setting. However, a six-week cycle of treatment is not considered to be the best schedule, and some clinicians use a modified schedule, such as a three-week cycle to keep a sufficient dose intensity with few adverse events. Therefore, it will be useful to determine whether a three-week cycle has an equal or greater efficacy and tolerance to side-effects compared with the standard six-week cycle schedule, and thus may be the most suitable treatment schedule for S-1 treatment.

Trial registration

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000006750.

Keywords:
Colon cancer; Stage III; Adjuvant chemotherapy; S-1