Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Efficacy and safety of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: the OPTImal DUAL antiplatelet therapy (OPTIDUAL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 14, Article number: 56 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridine is required after placement of coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) to prevent thrombotic complications. Current clinical guidelines recommend at least 6 to 12 months of treatment after a DES implantation, but it may be beneficial to apply dual antiplatelet therapy for a longer duration.

Methods/design

The optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (OPTIDUAL) study aims to compare the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy applied for either 12 or 48 months. We will examine the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with DES for the treatment of coronary lesions. The OPTIDUAL study is an open-label multicenter, randomized, national trial that will include 1,966 patients treated with DES. All patients will be treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months (+/− 3). Then, patients with no MACCE or major bleeding will be randomized to receive either 36 additional months of clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin only. The primary end-point is the combination of death from all causes, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding. The secondary end points include the individual components of the primary end-point, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization of the treated vessel and minor bleeding.

Discussion

This randomized trial is designed to assess the benefits and safety of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients that receive a DES. We aim to determine whether substantial prolongation of clopidogrel (a thienopyridine) after DES implantation offers an advantage over its discontinuation.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00822536

Peer Review reports

Background

In the first series of patients receiving a bare metal stent (BMS), stent thrombosis was already recognized as a severe complication after implantation owing to its high mortality. With the introduction of P2Y-receptor antagonists (that is, ticlopidine, clopidogrel) for platelet inhibition in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), the incidence of stent thrombosis decreased substantially in stable patients to levels as low as 1% [1]. Randomized controlled trials have established the efficacy of clopidogrel therapy following hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that were treated either medically or with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [2–4]. The implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) has become a standard treatment for the management of patients with coronary artery disease. The widespread use of DES has significantly reduced the risk for in-stent restenosis compared to BMS [5, 6]. However, there is some concern that DES might be associated with high rates of stent thrombosis, particularly beyond the first year after implantation [7]. The dominant risk factor for the occurrence of late stent thrombosis is discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin and thienopyridines (clopidogrel and prasugrel). Late stent thrombosis occurs within the first year after implantation of a DES [8–13]. It remains unknown whether it might be advantageous to prolong the 12-month antiplatelet thienopyridine (clopidogrel) therapy after DES implantation.

A recent update of the guidelines for PCI from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stressed that all patients that receive a DES should be given clopidogrel treatment for at least 12 months in the absence of increased risk of bleeding [14]. Interestingly, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on PCI differ slightly; they recommend clopidogrel therapy for 6 to 12 months after implantation of a DES, and for 9 to 12 months when a stenting procedure follows a presentation of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [15].

Early observational studies have suggested that extended use of clopidogrel in patients with a DES may be associated with reduced risk of death and myocardial infarction (MI) [7]. Additional studies have observed a clustering of adverse events in the initial 90 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel; this suggested the possibility of a clopidogrel rebound effect [16]. Based on those results, and also taking into account results from the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) study, some experts have advocated indefinite clopidogrel therapy [17]. However, when considering the potential beneficial effects of dual antiplatelet therapy, it is important to be aware that extending dual antiplatelet therapy beyond one year may induce bleeding complications. A meta-analysis of dual antiplatelet therapy has shown that this combination, compared to aspirin alone, reduced the risk of death, reinfarction and stroke by 15 to 34%; however, this benefit occurred at the expense of excess bleeding (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 2.30) [18].

Very recently, three trials have been published suggesting that a shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation may be beneficial [19–21]. However, to date, it is unknown whether prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy will decrease major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) that occur more than 12 months after stent implantation, including very late stent thrombosis. Furthermore, it is uncertain what the optimal duration would be for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, given the lack of data from randomized studies, the aim of the OPTIDUAL study is to assess the benefits and safety of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients that receive a DES.

Methods/design

The primary objective of the OPTIDUAL study (URL: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00822536; approved by the ethical committee, number CPP 34–2008) is to compare the efficacy of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation. We will test the hypothesis that 48 months is superior to 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Population

The study population will consist of 1,966 patients that have been taking dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months (+/− 3) after DES implantation. All patients will provide written informed consent to participate. At the beginning of the OPTIDUAL study, the patients will be randomized to either discontinue clopidogrel (12 months total) or to receive clopidogrel for an additional 36 months (48 months total). Inclusion and exclusion criteria are detailed in Table 1. No exclusion criterion is based on the type of DES implanted. Patients will be randomized without regard to the clinical status at presentation, including ACS, angina and silent myocardial ischemia. All enrolled subjects will have been treated with an approved DES and will have received 12 months (+/− 3) of aspirin plus thienopyridine. Doses of aspirin and clopidogrel will be based on the local standard of practice. Subjects may be enrolled into the study starting from immediately after the DES implantation, up to 12 months (+/− 3) after the DES, provided that they are on dual antiplatelet therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy must include at least six months of aspirin plus clopidogrel (three months of initial prasugrel is permitted). A total of 1,966 patients will be randomized at 40 clinical study sites in France.

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Full size table

Study design

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

The major exclusion criteria include 1) taking an oral anticoagulant therapy and 2) DES implantation in an unprotected left main coronary artery. BMS implantation in the same procedure is allowed. The complete list of inclusion and exclusion criteria is provided in Table 1. Malignancies and other comorbid conditions with a life expectancy <2 years are exclusion criteria screened by the principal investigator of each site. Patients with DES treated for 12 months (+/− 3) with aspirin and clopidogrel and who are event-free since the stent implantation (from myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, repeat coronary revascularization with a DES in the nine previous months or with a BMS in the last four weeks, moderate or major bleeding) are eligible for randomization.

Randomization

The patients are randomized (1:1) to receive either aspirin alone or a continuation of clopidogrel plus aspirin for an additional 36 months. Randomization is stratified by centers. A centralized telephone randomization will be used with an interactive voice response system that operates 24 h per day, seven days per week. This system will provide the investigator with a subject number and treatment arm.

Dosing regimens

After the index procedure, all subjects will take a daily dose of open-label clopidogrel and aspirin for 9 to 15 months after the index procedure. To minimize bleeding risk, the study will recommend that the aspirin dose should be the lowest acceptable dose, based on the physician’s discretion (75 to 160 mg) [22]. The recommended clopidogrel dosing will be a loading dose between 300 and 600 mg, and a maintenance dose of 75 mg daily to be continued for the duration of the treatment. Compliance is checked by a patient’s diary where the daily dose of each drug is reported. According to the results of CURENT-OASIS-7, clopidogrel dosing could be 150 mg per day for one week after the stent implantation in the setting of ACS [23]. Prasugrel could be administered after a PCI, but for no longer than three months. Patients that are not switched from prasugrel to clopidogrel at three months will not be randomized.

Follow-up

All randomized patients will be followed up for 36 months after randomization. Thus, patients randomized in the clopidogrel group will receive dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) for a total of four years (+/− three months). The other patients will receive aspirin alone (75 to 160 mg daily). Demographic, clinical and procedural information will be captured at the time of enrollment. In addition, we will record subsequent clinical end-points, serious adverse events and concomitant medications. Time of randomization that is the time when the studied strategy is beginning (that is, stopped or sustained dual therapy) will be considered as the time 0 for study endpoints. Subjects will be contacted at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after the randomization; that is, up to 48 months after the DES implantation. All end points and events that occur after randomization will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events committee, blinded to the assignment strategy. The committee will comprise physicians that are provided with all the data from medical records necessary to perform optimal adjudication.

Study end-points

The primary end-point of the study is the incidence of a composite end-point, including all-cause mortality, MI, stroke and major bleeding events. The MIs will be classified and adjudicated according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition [24]. Major bleeding events will be classified as fatal bleeding, intra-cranial bleeding (assessed by MRI, CT, or autopsy), hemorrhagic shock, a need for transfusion of at least two units of packed red blood cells, reductions in hemoglobin greater than 3 g/dl, intra-ocular bleeding that leads to visual loss or bleeding that requires surgery.

The secondary end-points of the study include the individual components of the primary composite end-point, stent thrombosis according to the ARC definition, repeat vessel revascularization and minor bleeding events.

Statistical considerations

Sample size

A sample size of 983 patients per group was calculated to provide an 80% power to demonstrate a difference between the two groups by survival analysis based on a Cox model. We assumed that the primary composite endpoint within three years post-randomization would be equal to 7% in one group vs. 4% in the other with an accrual period of 36 months. We also assumed a 5% two-sided significance level [25].

Study termination rules

An interim analysis will be made after 50% of the expected events have occurred. The study can be stopped to evaluate efficacy based on the conservative criterion of Peto (P <0.001). Based on a Bayesian calculation of conditional power (with Addplan software GmbH Koln Germany), the sample size can be reassessed and, when deemed futile, the study can be terminated [26].

Statistical analysis

All analyses will include the intention-to-treat population (all patients randomly assigned to treatment groups and analyzed as randomized, that is, patients crossing-over from one strategy to another will be analyzed in function of their group of randomization). Patients who drop-out will be censored at the time of the last available information.

The primary and secondary endpoints that are related to the time to an event will be analyzed with a survival analysis based on a Cox model. Alternative statistical models will be used when hypotheses regarding risks cannot be suitably analyzed with the Cox model. Other secondary endpoints will be analyzed with the χ 2 or Fisher’s exact test for frequent comparisons. Two-sided significance level is fixed at 5%. All tests will be performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NorthCarolina, USA).

Study management

The OPTIDUAL study is planned to be a multicenter open-label trial, conducted in France, and sponsored by the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (Paris, France). Funding has been obtained from the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris. An executive committee composed of experienced clinical investigators will provide trial leadership. A clinical events committee, blinded to the assignment strategy, will adjudicate all clinical events and a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is working. The committee will comprise physicians that are provided with all the data from medical records necessary to perform optimal adjudication.

Discussion

Several pivotal clinical trials have shown that, compared to a BMS, the DES is associated with significant reductions in the risk of restenosis and the need for target-lesion revascularization [5, 6]. Early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy has been identified as a risk factor for late stent thrombosis in patients with DES [9]. Furthermore, it was suggested that some late clinical events that occur later than one year after DES implantation may be due to delayed arterial healing after the implantation of DES. Therefore, current guidelines recommend aspirin and clopidogrel at a dose of 75 mg daily for at least 12 months after DES implantation for patients that are not at high risk for bleeding. However, it remains unknown what the optimal duration might be for dual antiplatelet therapy and whether the risk-benefit ratio could be improved with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for patients that receive DES. Due to the large number of DES implantations in the world each year, the optimization of dual antiplatelet therapy is important for both patient recovery and economic efficiency. The first randomized study on this issue was performed in Korea [19]. They analyzed combined data from two multicenter trials, the REAL-LATE and the ZEST-LATE trials. That study found that no significant benefit was associated with continuing clopidogrel plus aspirin beyond the 12-month treatment following DES implantation. They saw no reductions in the incidence of myocardial infarction or death from cardiac causes. Moreover, the rates of composite outcomes (MI, stroke, death) were higher with clopidogrel plus aspirin than with aspirin alone, although the difference was not significant. Recently, two additional studies investigated the effects of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. The EXCELLENT study, by Gwon et al., showed that, at 12 months after DES implantation, patients treated with 12-month and 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy showed similar risks for target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, MI and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization [20]. However, the non-inferiority margin was wide, and the study was underpowered for death and MI. In the other study, by Valgimigli et al., 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in patients with DES or BMS was not significantly more effective than a 6-month clopidogrel regimen for reducing the composite endpoint of death, MI and cerebrovascular accident [21]. In that study, two years of clopidogrel therapy resulted in a significant increase in bleeding episodes. Although those studies were interesting, and they suggested the possibility that a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy might be sufficient after DES implantation, they did not rule out the possibility that prolonging the clopidogrel plus aspirin treatment might result in a reduction of MACCE.

Given the importance of this subject, it is not surprising that a few clinical trials are currently ongoing to investigate optimal treatment times. The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) study aims to compare the benefits and risks of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI, and it has the largest number of subjects [27]. Over 20,000 subjects will be enrolled at approximately 220 international clinical study sites. Most of the patients (>15,000) will receive a DES. Interestingly, in that prolonged combined antiplatelet therapy, patients will receive either clopidogrel or prasugrel, a new thienopyridine that recently appeared on the market. Another interesting ongoing trial aims to assess whether discontinuation of clopidogrel plus aspirin at six months after DES implantation would be non-inferior to a routine, one-year treatment [28].

Conclusion

Our trial will conduct a substantially prolonged treatment of clopidogrel plus aspirin, for up to four years after DES implantation. We aim to determine whether long-term treatment would be superior to discontinuation at one year.

Trial status

This study is currently recruiting patients.

Abbreviations

ACS:

Acute coronary syndrome

ARC:

Academic research consortium

ASA:

Acetylsalicylic acid

BMS:

Bare metal stent

CAPRIE:

Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events

DAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

DES:

Drug-eluting stents

DSMB:

Data and safety monitoring board

MACCE:

Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events

MI:

Myocardial infarction

OPTIDUAL:

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

References

  1. Bertrand ME, Rupprecht HJ, Urban P, Gershlick AH: Double-blind study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary stenting: the clopidogrel aspirin stent international cooperative study (CLASSICS). Circulation. 2000, 102: 624-629. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.6.624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK: Clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent Events trial investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345: 494-502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, Bertrand ME, Lewis BS, Natarajan MK, Malmberg K, Rupprecht H, Zhao F, Chrolavicius S, Copland I, Fox KA: Clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent events trial (CURE) investigators. Effects of pre-treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 2001, 358: 527-533. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05701-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinbuhl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, Fry RT, Wilmer C, Topol EJ, CREDO Investigators: Clopidogrel for the reduction of events during observation (CREDO) investigators. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002, 288: 2411-2420. 10.1001/jama.288.19.2411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE, SIRIUS Investigators: Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 1315-1323. 10.1056/NEJMoa035071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone GW, Elis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ: Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators: a polymer-based, placlitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 221-231. 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, Rickenbacher P, Hunziker P, Mueller C, Jeger R, Bader F, Osswald S, Kaiser C, BASKET-LATE Investigators: Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48: 2584-2591. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, Kramer JM, Harrington RA, Matchar DB, Kandzari DE, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Califf RM: Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007, 297: 159-168. 10.1001/jama.297.2.joc60179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park DW, Park SW, Park KH, Lee BK, Kim YH, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SJ: Frequency of and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 98: 352-356. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nair R, Simon DI: Antiplatelet therapy in the era of late stent thrombosis. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2008, 10: 12-17. 10.1007/s11936-008-0002-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho PM, Fihn SD, Wang L, Bryson CL, Lowy E, Maynard C, Magid DJ, Peterson ED, Jesse RL, Rumsfeld JS: Clopidogrel and long-term outcomes after stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007, 154: 846-851. 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spertus JA, Kettelkamp R, Vance C, Decker C, Jones PG, Rumsfeld JS, Messenger JC, Khanal S, Peterson ED, Bach RG, Krumholz HM, Cohen DJ: Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry. Circulation. 2006, 113: 2803-2809. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Artang R, Dieter RS: Analysis of 36 reported cases of late thrombosis in drug-eluting stents placed in coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2007, 99: 1039-1043. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW, 2005 Writing Committee Members: Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to review new evidence and update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. Writing on behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation. 2008, 117: 261-295. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188208. Erratum in Circulation 2008, 117:e161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, Jørgensen E, Marco J, Nordrehaug JE, Ruzyllo W, Urban P, Stone GW, Wijns W: Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26: 804-847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho PM, Peterson ED, Wang L, Magid DJ, Fihn SD, Larsen GC, Jesse RA, Rumsfeld JS: Incidence of death and acute myocardial infarction associated with stopping clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome. JAMA. 2008, 299: 532-539. 10.1001/jama.299.5.532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. CAPRIE Steering Committee: A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996, 348: 1329-1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowry AD, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK: Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel as compared to antiplatelet monotherapy for the prevention of vascular events. Am J Cardiol. 2008, 101: 960-966. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SJ, Park DW, Kim YH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Han KH, Park SW, Yun SC, Lee SG, Rha SW, Seong IW, Jeong MH, Hur SH, Lee NH, Yoon J, Yang JY, Lee BK, Choi YJ, Chung WS, Lim DS, Cheong SS, Kim KS, Chae JK, Nah DY, Jeon DS, Seung KB, Jang JS, Park HS, Lee K: Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 1374-1382. 10.1056/NEJMoa1001266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gwon HC, Hahn JY, Park KW, Song YB, Chae IH, Lim DS, Han KR, Choi JH, Choi SH, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Ahn T, Yoon JH, Jeong MH, Hong TJ, Chung WY, Choi YJ, Hur SH, Kwon HM, Jeon DW, Kim BO, Park SH, Lee NH, Jeon HK, Jang Y, Kim HS: Six-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents: the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss after Stenting (EXCELLENT) randomized, multicenter study. Circulation. 2012, 24: 505-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Monti M, Vranckx P, Percoco G, Tumscitz C, Castriota F, Colombo F, Tebaldi M, Fucà G, Kubbajeh M, Cangiano E, Minarelli M, Scalone A, Cavazza C, Frangione A, Borghesi M, Marchesini J, Parrinello G, Ferrari R, Prolonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading Stent-Induced Intimal Hyperplasia Study (PRODIGY) Investigators: Short- versus long-term duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting. A randomized multicenter trial. Circulation. 2012, 125: 2015-2026. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell CL, Smyth S, Montalescot G, Steinhubl SR: Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007, 297: 2018-2024. 10.1001/jama.297.18.2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, Jolly SS, Joyner CD, Granger CB, Faxon DP, Rupprecht HJ, Budaj A, Avezum A, Widimsky P, Steg PG, Bassand JP, Montalescot G, Macaya C, Di Pasquale G, Niemela K, Ajani AE, White HD, Chrolavicius S, Gao P, Fox KA, Yusuf S, CURRENT-OASIS 7 trial investigators: Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (Current-Oasis 7): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2010, 376: 1233-1243. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research Consortium: Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007, 115: 2344-2351. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lakatos E, Lan KK: A comparison of sample size methods for the logrank statistics. Stat Med. 1992, 11: 179-191. 10.1002/sim.4780110205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Proschan MA, Liu Q, Hunsberger S: Practical midcourse sample size modifications in clinical trials. Contr Clin Trials. 2003, 24: 4-15. 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00240-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mauri L, Kereiaked DJ, Normand SL, Wiviott SD, Cohen DJ, Holmes DR, Bangalore S, Cutlip DE, Pencina M, Massaro JM: Rationale and design of the dual antiplatelet therapy study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with either drug-eluting stent or baremetal stent placement for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. Am Heart J. 2010, 160: 1035-1041. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Byrne RA, Schulz S, Mehilli J, Iijima R, Massberg S, Neumann FJ, ten Berg JM, Schömig A, Kastrati A, Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Safety And EFficacy of Six Months Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting (ISAR-SAFE) Investigators: Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 versus 12 months clopidogrel therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Safety and Efficacy of 6 Months Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting (ISAR-SAFE) study. Am Heart J. 2009, 157: 620-624. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.12.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Emmanuel Berman, Vidhya Raghavan, Florence Reboullet for the acquisition of data and to Véronique Jouis for the management of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. bd Vincent Auriol, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France

    Gérard Helft, Claude Le Feuvre & Jean-Philippe Metzger

  2. rue de Versailles Hôpital Mignot, Versailles, France

    Jean Louis Georges

  3. avenue Jean Poulhes, CHU, Toulouse, France

    Didier Carrie

  4. avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud Hôpital, CHU, Montpellier, France

    Florence Leclercq

  5. rue de Germont, CHU, Rouen, France

    Hélène Eltchaninoff

  6. rue Larrey, CHU, Angers, France

    Alain Furber & Fabrice Prunier

  7. rue de Turin Clinique Turin, Paris, France

    Laurent Sebagh

  8. Hôpital Le Raincy, 10, rue du Général Leclerc, Le Raincy, France

    Simon Cattan

  9. place du Pr-Debré GHU, Carémeau, Nîmes, France

    Guillaume Cayla

  10. rue du Faubourg St Denis URC Hôpital, Lariboisière, Paris, France

    Eric Vicaut

Authors
  1. Gérard Helft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claude Le Feuvre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Louis Georges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Didier Carrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Florence Leclercq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hélène Eltchaninoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alain Furber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fabrice Prunier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laurent Sebagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Simon Cattan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Guillaume Cayla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Eric Vicaut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jean-Philippe Metzger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Helft.

Additional information

Competing interests

This study is funded by the AP-HP (PHRC) and grants from Cordis, Boston, Medtronic, Terumo and Biotronik.

Authors’ contributions

GH, CLF and JPM conceived the study. GH, CLF, JPM and EV participated in the study design. GH, CLF, JLG, DC, FL, HE, AF, FP, LS, SC and GC will recruit, select and collect clinical data of the patients. EV will perform statistical analysis. GH is the principal investigator. GH and EV drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helft, G., Le Feuvre, C., Georges, J.L. et al. Efficacy and safety of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: the OPTImal DUAL antiplatelet therapy (OPTIDUAL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 14, 56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-56

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-56

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215