Peer Review reports
From: A review of the handling of missing longitudinal outcome data in clinical trials
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shona Fielding |
| 10 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
| 18 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shona Fielding |
| 17 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
| 26 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Peacock |
| 1 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Powney |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 May 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-237 |
You can find further information about peer review here.