|
Survey of journals editors' endorsement of extensions to the CONSORT Statement * |
|||
| Yes |
No |
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|||
| Journal recommends authors comply with the CONSORT |
|||
| Cluster extension |
31 (69%) |
10 (22%) |
4 (9%) |
| Harms extension |
27 (60%) |
11 (24%) |
7 (16%) |
| Herbal extension |
13 (29%) |
10 (22%) |
22 (49%) |
| Non-inferiority and equivalence extension |
19 (42%) |
12 (27%) |
14 (31%) |
|
|
|||
| Journal requires authors comply with the CONSORT |
|||
| Cluster extension |
22 (49%) |
16 (36%) |
7 (15%) |
| Harms extension |
18 (40%) |
18 (40%) |
9 (20%) |
| Herbal extension |
12 (26%) |
14 (30%) |
20 (44%) |
| Non-inferiority and equivalence extension |
13 (29%) |
17 (39%) |
14 (32%) |
|
|
|||
| Journal mentions CONSORT extension in its 'Instructions to Authors' |
|||
| Cluster extension |
12 (27%) |
28 (62%) |
5 (11%) |
| Harms extension |
10 (22%) |
29 (65%) |
6 (13%) |
| Herbal extension |
5 (12%) |
24 (56%) |
14 (32%) |
| Non-inferiority and equivalence extension |
5 (12%) |
28 (65%) |
10 (23%) |
|
* Some responders did not complete all sections of the survey. | |||
Hopewell et al. Trials 2008 9:20 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-20 |
|||