Peer Review reports
From: What constitutes a "clinical trial"?: A survey of oncology professionals
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 18 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Trimble |
| 29 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sven Trelle |
| 7 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - susan dent |
| 4 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 4 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sven Trelle |
| 20 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - susan dent |
| 6 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - James Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 6 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - James Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Mar 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Mar 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-9-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.