Open Access Highly Accessed Study protocol

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of physician education and activation versus two rehabilitation programs for the treatment of Whiplash-associated Disorders: The University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial

Pierre Côté12*, J David Cassidy12, Simon Carette34, Eleanor Boyle2, Heather M Shearer2, Maja Stupar25, Carlo Ammendolia25, Gabrielle van der Velde256, Jill A Hayden7, Xiaoqing Yang8, Maurits van Tulder9 and John W Frank11011

Author Affiliations

1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

2 Division of Health Care & Outcomes Research, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network (UHN Rehabilitation Solutions), Toronto, Canada

3 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

4 Division of Rheumatology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

5 Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

6 Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

7 Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

8 Buffalo Grove, IL, USA

9 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands

10 Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

11 Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Trials 2008, 9:75  doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-75

Published: 24 December 2008

Abstract

Background

Whiplash injuries are an important public health problem that is associated with significant disability and high health care utilization. Recent cohort studies suggest that physician care may be the most effective treatment for patients with whiplash-associated disorders. However, these findings have not been tested in a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to determine which of physician care or two rehabilitation programs of care is most effective in improving recovery of patients with recent whiplash associated disorders.

Methods and Design

We designed a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. A total of 444 participants (148 in each of three arms) who reside in Southern Ontario, Canada will be recruited from a large insurer. We will include individuals who are 18 years of age or older and who are diagnosed with Grade I or II Whiplash-associated Disorders. Participants will be randomized to physician-based education and activation or one of two rehabilitation programs of care currently in use in Ontario. Our primary outcome, self-rated global recovery and all secondary outcomes (neck pain intensity, whiplash disability, health-related quality of life, depressive symptomatology and satisfaction with care) will be measured at baseline by a trial coordinator and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up by an interviewer who is blind to the participants' baseline characteristics and treatment allocation. We will also collect information on general health status, other injuries, comorbidities, expectation of recovery, work status, pain coping, legal representation, and co-interventions. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will compare time to recovery between the three interventions. This trial will have 90% power at an alpha of 0.05 to detect a 20% difference in the rate of perceived recovery at one year. Secondary analyses will compare the health outcomes, rate of recurrence and the rate of adverse events between intervention groups.

Conclusion

The results of this study will provide the public, clinicians and policy makers much needed evidence on the effectiveness of common approaches used to manage whiplash-associated disorders.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00546806